jtcam-data-12997: Comparison between 2D and 3D fiber-matrix debonding simulation for inverse identification of interface fracture properties
Contributions
-------------
* Author #1 did contribute to
* Author #2 did contribute to
Data collection: period and details
-----------------------------------
* From XXX to XXX, ...
Funding sources
---------------
* Add the funding sources
Data structure and information
------------------------------
Put a description of the data structure
*Hint:*
JTCAM curation policy
---------------------
**First things first: JTCAM data editors are here to help!**
**Second: the JTCAM data curation policy** can be found here: https://zenodo.org/communities/jtcam/curation-policy
JTCAM editors wish to follow the FAIR principles regarding the open data and algorithms: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FAIR_data
The intention is to publish data relevant to the JTCAM paper. This includes:
- Raw data used to produce Figures
- Experimental data
- Simulation Input and Output
- Algorithms (software, scripts)
In essence, this *Open Data* approach will allow **reproducibility** and an **easy analysis by another research group**.
Data structure and information
------------------------------
*Authors are required to provide one **README.md** file per directory to help
navigation through the data*
**Here the authors are expected to provide a full description of the directories
hierarchy with a consise description. For instance it could be:**
+ Folder/files structure:
+ `Case 1/` - folder containing results for case 1
+ `README.md` - Description
+ `Case1_EXP_*.csv` - experimental data files
+ `Case1_SIM_INPUT*.inp` - simulation input
+ `Case1_SIM_OUTPUT*.csv` - simulation output
+ `Case2/` - folder containing results for case 2
+ `README.md` - Description
+ `Case2_EXP_*.csv` - experimental data files
+ `Case2_SIM_*.csv` - simulation output
+ `PlotScripts/` - folder containing plotting scripts if any
+ `README.md` - Description of the plotting scripts
+ `plot_fig1-10.py` - python script plotting figure 1-10
+ `plot_fig10-20.py` - python script plotting figure 1-20
Paper Description
-----------------
Fiber-matrix debonding in single fiber specimen is studied experimentally and numerically based on the coupled criterion for which various 2D and one 3D configurations are used. Debonding initiation and propagation are mainly due to normal opening stresses in a 3D model whereas shear stresses play a minor role contrary to a 2D front model, i.e. in a plane normal to the fiber main axis. The 3D model enables describing the free surface singularity similarly to a 2D side model, i.e. along the fiber main axis. The latter cannot represent the debonding arrest and stable propagation after initiation. Overall, a 2D front model under plane strain assumption provides the best description of debonding initiation loading level compared to the 3D model, yet for a larger debonding opening. Experimental debonding openings are determined using DIC, providing the debonding initiation remote loading and corresponding opening. Tensile strengths and critical energy release rates respectively slightly higher and in the same order of magnitude are identified in 3D, based on the debonding opening, compared to a 2D front model.